![]() The disadvantage to that is that you have to either use aging hacks or play each family in a rotation, or your played Sims will grow old while the neighborhood remains, unaging, around them. Which is why I love Sims 2 and haven’t yet moved to 3! Sims 2 allows for a broader style of play. It also lets your Sims leave their home and go around town, where Sims 2 is mostly confined to the house (Sims 2 has community lots, but you can go your entire game never using them.) Sims 3 is focused more on things like collecting items and playing some of the minigames - the designers have directed play much more, where Sims 2 is more of an open box. Sims 3 allows for fatter Sims as a default, without custom content. It is not a good game if you care about the entire neighborhood, because the game will move out other Sims and play them while you’re playing one family (you can change the settings to make them not do anything major, but they’ll still age, and there are still issues with trying to play multiple families AFAIK - the designers really mean Sims 3 to be played as you playing one family through many generations.) Sims 3 is better if you want to play one Sim - not really one family, but one Sim within that family. Input?Īctually, that probably deserves a longer reblog (and the note that I don’t own Sims 3, just 2.) I know I should be all “nah, just save money” but instead I’m trying to decide if I want to buy Sims 2 again or Sims 3. I want to play The Sims but I lost my Sims disc so I’d have to go buy another one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |